01/03/2017

 

Due to a S&P attorney complex strategy, the court has refused to satisfy petition of the Prosecutor General’s office of Ukraine against the head of the international company on a restriction measure remand in custody.

 

Thanks to a complex protection and qualitative strategy, the S&P company protected the client’s rights (the head of an international company) during the petition consideration of the investigator of the Prosecutor General’s office of Ukraine on choosing a restriction measure against the head remand in custody, and proved its baseless to the court. Due to arguments of the S&P attorneys, petition satisfaction for the representatives of the Prosecutor General’s office of Ukraine was refused.

Get In Touch